Table of Contents

Transfer Pricing in India: Arm’s Length, Methods & Compliance Explained

Transfer pricing is a critical aspect of international taxation, especially for multinational enterprises (MNEs) with associated enterprises across borders. It ensures that transactions between related entities are priced at arm’s length—meaning they reflect the same pricing as transactions between independent enterprises. This guide explains the concept, methods, regulations, and compliance procedures related to transfer pricing in India.

1. Introduction to Transfer Pricing

TP refers to the pricing of goods, services, or intangible assets transferred between associated enterprises (e.g., parent and subsidiary companies). These transactions may be priced differently than those between independent entities due to the relationship between the parties. To prevent tax avoidance through manipulation of transfer prices, the concept of Arm’s Length Price (ALP) is introduced, ensuring that transactions between related parties are priced as if they were between unrelated parties.

The core objective of transfer pricing is to ensure that profits are reported in the right jurisdictions, and taxes are paid accordingly, preventing erosion of tax revenue through shifting of profits across borders.

2. The Arm's Length Principle

The Arm’s Length Principle (ALP) is the cornerstone of transfer pricing regulations. It states that the price for any transaction between related entities should be the same as if the transaction occurred between independent entities in similar circumstances. The purpose is to ensure that the tax authorities can accurately assess the income earned in each jurisdiction and avoid tax avoidance strategies, such as profit shifting from high-tax jurisdictions to low-tax jurisdictions.

3. Methods for Determining Arm's Length Price

There are several methods prescribed by the Indian Income Tax Act and OECD guidelines for determining the Arm’s Length Price (ALP). These methods are designed to be used depending on the nature of the transaction:

3.1 Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) Method

This is the most direct method, where the price of a transaction between related parties is compared with the price charged for the same transaction between independent parties under similar circumstances.

Example: A subsidiary in India selling goods to its parent company in the US will have its price checked against similar goods sold by independent sellers in the open market.

3.2. Resale Price Method (RPM)

This method applies when goods are purchased from a related party and then resold to an independent third party. The resale price is adjusted by subtracting a gross margin that an independent reseller would have earned in a similar transaction.

Example: An Indian distributor buys products from its foreign parent company and sells them in India. The resale price method compares the margin earned by similar resellers to determine the ALP.

3.3. Cost Plus Method

This method is used when the related party provides goods or services. It involves adding a markup to the cost of production or services to determine the price.

Example: A parent company in the US provides research services to its subsidiary in India. The cost-plus method adds a reasonable markup on the cost of services to determine the price.

3.4. Profit Split Method

This method is used when transactions are highly integrated, and it’s difficult to isolate individual prices for the goods or services. Profits are split between the related parties based on an agreed formula, typically reflecting their contribution to the business.

Example: Two related entities in different countries collaborate on developing a new product. The profits from the product sales will be split based on the contributions made by each entity.

3.5. Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM)

This method compares the net profit margin of a controlled transaction with the net profit margin earned in similar uncontrolled transactions. It is useful when other methods are not applicable.

Example: A company in India provides IT services to its foreign parent. The TNMM would compare the net margin of this transaction to similar independent transactions.

4. Compliance Requirements in India

4.1. TRANSFER PRICING Report

In India, businesses involved in related party transactions must furnish a TP report. This report must include the following:

• A description of the international transactions and domestic transactions with related parties.

• Details of the transfer pricing method used.

• Financials of the taxpayer and its related entities.

• An analysis of comparable data to support the ALP determination.

The report must be filed with the tax authorities along with the income tax return. The report should be prepared by a qualified accountant or tax professional.

4.2. TP Officer (TPO) Involvement

The Assessing Officer (AO) may refer a case to the TP Officer (TPO) if they believe that the pricing of transactions between related entities is not at arm’s length. The TPO will then assess the ALP, taking into account various factors and evidence provided by the taxpayer.

The TPO may call for further documentation, and based on the review, will propose any adjustments to the transfer prices.

4.3. Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR)

India has implemented Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR) for MNEs. As per this requirement, large multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding a specified threshold (INR 6,400 crore as of FY 2020-21) must file a CbC report. This report provides a detailed breakdown of profits, taxes paid, and economic activity across different jurisdictions where the MNE operates.

The CbC report is designed to enhance transparency in cross-border taxation and is exchanged between tax authorities of different countries under the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement (MCAA).

5. TP Adjustments and Penalties

5.1. TP Adjustments

If the TPO determines that the transfer prices are not in line with the arm’s length principle, they may make adjustments to the reported profits. The adjustments could result in additional tax liabilities for the taxpayer.

For example, if a subsidiary in India under-reports its income by using a low transfer price on sales to the parent company, the tax authorities may adjust the pricing to bring it in line with the arm’s length price and impose additional tax.

5.2. Penalties for Non-Compliance

Failure to comply with transfer pricing regulations can result in penalties, including:

• Penalty for failure to maintain proper documentation: Up to 2% of the value of international transactions.

• Penalty for failure to file a transfer pricing report: 2% of the value of the international transactions.

• Penalty for under-reporting of income: A penalty of 50% of the tax due on the adjusted income.

6. Practical Example of TP in India

Let’s assume that a US-based parent company sells goods to its Indian subsidiary for INR 100,000, but similar goods in the open market are priced at INR 120,000. The Indian tax authorities may question the low transfer price, arguing that the transaction is not at arm’s length.

• The parent company may argue that the price is justified based on specific agreements, such as bulk discounts, or the terms of sale.

• However, if the Indian tax authorities find that the transaction is priced below the market value (INR 120,000), they may adjust the transfer price and impose tax on the difference.

7. Conclusion

TP is a complex and important aspect of international taxation, especially in India, where regulatory compliance is strictly enforced. MNEs operating in India must ensure that their intercompany transactions are priced at arm’s length to avoid legal issues, penalties, and adjustments by the tax authorities. Understanding the transfer pricing methods, maintaining proper documentation, and ensuring timely compliance with the regulations will help businesses mitigate risks and optimize their tax positions. For professional assistance, reach out to us on email: info@returnfilings.com or on whatsapp: https://wa.me/919910123091.

frequently asked questions (faq's) related to Transfer Pricing

Q What is transfer pricing?+

Q Why is transfer pricing important?+

Q Who is affected by TP regulations?+

Q What is the arm's length principle?+

Q How is the arm's length price determined?+

Q Which transfer pricing method should be used?+

Q What is the importance of documentation in transfer pricing?+

Q What are the transfer pricing regulations in India?+

Q What are the penalties for non-compliance with transfer pricing regulations in India?+

Q What is the role of the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) in India?+

Q What are some common transfer pricing issues faced by businesses?+

Q How can businesses manage transfer pricing risk?+

Q How do I find comparable data for transfer pricing?+

Q What is the difference between transfer pricing and tax evasion?+

Q How can I avoid transfer pricing disputes with tax authorities?+

Q What is the impact of transfer pricing on multinational companies?+

Q What is the role of the OECD in transfer pricing?+

Q What are the latest developments in transfer pricing regulations?+

Q How can I comply with transfer pricing regulations in different countries?+

Q What are the common transfer pricing methods used in India?+

Q What is the importance of intercompany agreements?+

Q Where can I find advice regarding transfer pricing matters?+